<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just a Virgin Birth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchvoices.com/archives/170/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/170</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Reed</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/170#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Who said that?

And correct my ignorance if this is not the case, but the gnostic teaching concerning Jesus' humanity is not that it was uncreated, but that it was not extant at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said that?</p>
<p>And correct my ignorance if this is not the case, but the gnostic teaching concerning Jesus&#8217; humanity is not that it was uncreated, but that it was not extant at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh S</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/170#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Saying Jesus' humanity was uncreated is also known as "gnosticism."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying Jesus&#8217; humanity was uncreated is also known as &#8220;gnosticism.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Reed</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/170#comment-526</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure that has a lot to do with since the virgin birth has never required a naturalistic explanation.  It is a miraculous event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that has a lot to do with since the virgin birth has never required a naturalistic explanation.  It is a miraculous event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canopy</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Canopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/170#comment-524</guid>
		<description>With cloning and IVF, I think modern people should find it easier to believe in virgin births.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With cloning and IVF, I think modern people should find it easier to believe in virgin births.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
