<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking Our Cues from the World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchvoices.com/archives/176/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/176</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the evangelical outpost</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/176/comment-page-1#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>the evangelical outpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/?p=176#comment-576</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Overheard (v.3)&lt;/strong&gt;

"Pat [Robertson] doesn't speak for evangelicals any more than Dr. Phil speaks for mental health professionals." -- Ted Haggard, president of the National Association of Evangelicals, **** "There was a time, not all that long ago, where expressing r...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Overheard (v.3)</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Pat [Robertson] doesn&#8217;t speak for evangelicals any more than Dr. Phil speaks for mental health professionals.&#8221; &#8212; Ted Haggard, president of the National Association of Evangelicals, **** &#8220;There was a time, not all that long ago, where expressing r&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Reed</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/176/comment-page-1#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/?p=176#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Of course you haven't, not when its either tolerated or met with an extremely negative reaction.  In one case its not recognized as sin, in the other no one wants to be the object of scorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you haven&#8217;t, not when its either tolerated or met with an extremely negative reaction.  In one case its not recognized as sin, in the other no one wants to be the object of scorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Carr</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/176/comment-page-1#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/?p=176#comment-573</guid>
		<description>I'm just thinking about the people I've encountered in ministry during the past few years. I've known both homosexuals [and fornicators] and racist people. Recalling this, that I've encountered people who have admitted that they struggled with sexual sin, I have yet to hear someone admit that they have struggled with being a racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just thinking about the people I&#8217;ve encountered in ministry during the past few years. I&#8217;ve known both homosexuals [and fornicators] and racist people. Recalling this, that I&#8217;ve encountered people who have admitted that they struggled with sexual sin, I have yet to hear someone admit that they have struggled with being a racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
