This entry was posted on Thursday, January 26th, 2006 at 10:58 am and is filed under The Church, Theology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Pages:
Feeds
Categories:
- Administration (6)
- Apologetics (22)
- Church Growth (13)
- Culture (139)
- Devotional (21)
- Media (10)
- Misc. (31)
- Philosophy (19)
- Podcasts (22)
- Question (10)
- Scripture (21)
- Testimony (6)
- The Church (74)
- The Outlaw Church (3)
- Theology (82)
- Uncategorized (149)
Archives:
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Meta:
Blech.
01.26.2006 by Tim Reed
I just completely ignore emergents and thier churches now. I used to pay attention. Until I realized that emergents were either not interested in conforming to scripture or were really nothing new (and most fall into the second category). For a prime example of the first go here.
Earlier I posted a bit from William Lane Craig about how postmodernism is just the re-packaging of modernism. I’ve had doubts about that assessment. But this quote from McLaren has pretty much pushed me completely over into the Craig camp.
Perhaps we need a five-year moratorium on making pronouncements [about homosexuality]. In the meantime, we’ll practice prayerful Christian dialogue, listening respectfully, disagreeing agreeably. When decisions need to be made, they’ll be admittedly provisional. We’ll keep our ears attuned to scholars in biblical studies, theology, ethics, psychology, genetics, sociology, and related fields.
Ah, so in order to know the proper response to homosexuality we should be consulting fields of study that were the direct result of modernism. You may agree or disagree with this methodology, but you can’t call it anything but modernism. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.