This entry was posted on Saturday, September 1st, 2007 at 3:19 pm and is filed under Culture, The Church, Theology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Pages:
Feeds
Categories:
- Administration (6)
- Apologetics (20)
- Church Growth (13)
- Culture (122)
- Devotional (13)
- Media (8)
- Misc. (27)
- Philosophy (18)
- Podcasts (20)
- Question (9)
- Scripture (15)
- Testimony (6)
- The Church (59)
- The Outlaw Church (3)
- Theology (70)
- Uncategorized (129)
Archives:
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Meta:
From Cain Ridge to Wittenberg
09.1.2007 by Tim Reed
Here is the account of a guy who left Restoration Movement for Lutheranism.
As I read through his account it struck me how different the teaching I’ve received are from what he received. Check out his account of the Lord’s Supper:
In the Restoration Movement, the Lord’s Supper had always been about how well we cleansed ourselves via our sense of humilty before taking the Lord’s Supper. Instead of the sacrament being about how God touches His people, it was about how His people ascend to him through an impossible exercise of spiritual purity.
Contrast that with this from The Faith Once For All by Dr. Jack Cottrell, “The Lord’s Supper likewis is both worship and edification. We take the emblems not only as a memorial to honor our Savior, but also as a means of reminding ourselves that his blood is the only reason we are saved.” Now, I am by no means equivocating a sacramental view to the Restoration Movement, or to this particular statement. What I am saying though is that this view of the Lord’s Supper and the view that the Lord’s Supper is some sort of works based leaping towards God don’t equivocate either.
In fact as I found myself reading over his journey to Lutheranism I found myself thinking that if I were presented with the same sort of faith through the Restoration Movement that he was I would probably be Lutheran today as well.
Sadly, his story didn’t surprise me. Unfortunately, due to the decentralized nature of the Restoration Movement, and taking our theological identity from baptismal regeneration* there is a riptide of works based theology. I believe its fading, but its still out there, and I would rather have someone journey to Wittenberg than flail about in a vain attempt to work their way into the kingdom of God.
*I’m not saying either decentralization or staking our theological identity on baptismal regeneration are bad things, I’m just saying that due to the circumstance and emphasis on each the result has been to allow a works based theology to creep in, which is the unfortunate part.
September 14th, 2007 at 7:06 pm
A structured denomination has it’s weaknesses, too. I’ve heard of ministers being kept from changing things because the area director doesn’t want to see the numbers go down. Even if the people who would be leaving are the ones causing trouble in the church.
I’ve met some people out here in Utah who grew up in the restoration movement. One of them called it a cult to my face (after telling her my background). Her church actually had a works based salvation described in their beliefs.