<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9 months of fatherhood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchvoices.com/archives/455/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/455</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kibble</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-10122</link>
		<dc:creator>Kibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-10122</guid>
		<description>If I were Calvin, I think I'd stick with what the Bible says, without trying to extrapolate into a tight theological system.  Seems like the thinking of man.  Is God really enslaved to his own glory?  Does he also lack the freewill required to do otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were Calvin, I think I&#8217;d stick with what the Bible says, without trying to extrapolate into a tight theological system.  Seems like the thinking of man.  Is God really enslaved to his own glory?  Does he also lack the freewill required to do otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9966</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 04:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9966</guid>
		<description>Tommy Boy.  Nice.  Chad, I believe Tim is one up with his quote.  It was apropriate, accurate, more witty, and closed out his comment with humorous flair.  Also, the source of the quote is irrelevant the second the person uses the quote in a negative way.  Seeing as both quotes were used in a negative sarcastic fashion, that places them on equal ground.

Also, this is a first for me, Tim, you just pwned Silva.  Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy Boy.  Nice.  Chad, I believe Tim is one up with his quote.  It was apropriate, accurate, more witty, and closed out his comment with humorous flair.  Also, the source of the quote is irrelevant the second the person uses the quote in a negative way.  Seeing as both quotes were used in a negative sarcastic fashion, that places them on equal ground.</p>
<p>Also, this is a first for me, Tim, you just pwned Silva.  Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad McIntosh</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9931</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad McIntosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9931</guid>
		<description>I don't know, Tim. It seems Silva quoted more Christian-friendly entertainment. I think he's got you pinned here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, Tim. It seems Silva quoted more Christian-friendly entertainment. I think he&#8217;s got you pinned here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Silva</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9921</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9921</guid>
		<description>And now here's some wisdom from Leave It To Beaver:

"Aw shucks Tim, you're my hero!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now here&#8217;s some wisdom from Leave It To Beaver:</p>
<p>&#8220;Aw shucks Tim, you&#8217;re my hero!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Silva</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9919</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9919</guid>
		<description>\"After experiencing fatherhood for nine months I can’t imagine trying to cast God as doing everything for his glory.\"

Yeah, \"if I was God...\" The single dumbest things any human being could ever say - \"if I were God.\" 

What possible reference point could a finite human being possibly have to compare themself to an eternal Self-existing disembodied Spirit Who is infinite, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient and Truine in nature?

I\'m sorry, what was that you were saying; \"if I were God...\"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>\&#8221;After experiencing fatherhood for nine months I can’t imagine trying to cast God as doing everything for his glory.\&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, \&#8221;if I was God&#8230;\&#8221; The single dumbest things any human being could ever say - \&#8221;if I were God.\&#8221; </p>
<p>What possible reference point could a finite human being possibly have to compare themself to an eternal Self-existing disembodied Spirit Who is infinite, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient and Truine in nature?</p>
<p>I\&#8217;m sorry, what was that you were saying; \&#8221;if I were God&#8230;\&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve carr</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9879</link>
		<dc:creator>steve carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/455#comment-9879</guid>
		<description>I'm really not a Calvinism hater, but things like this controversy bring it out in me. I saw this thing get started and knew that it would spread like wild fire. 

They start with the basis that Reformed theology is correct without question and will voraciously defend all aspects of it even if it is ridiculous. The result is something like this statement one of the Witherington attackers made: "God is at the center of his own affections. The supreme love of God's life is God."

Bend Scripture around to defend that statement if you must, but it's still ridiculous. 

If you tire of this argument, stick around; a new one is right around the corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really not a Calvinism hater, but things like this controversy bring it out in me. I saw this thing get started and knew that it would spread like wild fire. </p>
<p>They start with the basis that Reformed theology is correct without question and will voraciously defend all aspects of it even if it is ridiculous. The result is something like this statement one of the Witherington attackers made: &#8220;God is at the center of his own affections. The supreme love of God&#8217;s life is God.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bend Scripture around to defend that statement if you must, but it&#8217;s still ridiculous. </p>
<p>If you tire of this argument, stick around; a new one is right around the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
