<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Game!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchvoices.com/archives/484/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/484</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/484/comment-page-1#comment-10672</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/484#comment-10672</guid>
		<description>Okay, I'll do mine here too.  But Tim still loses because he only tagged 2 people, and I don't count.

Unchristian by David Kinnaman and Gabe Lyons

"'Christianity is so predictable,' one person we interviewed said with contempt.  Two-thrids of young outsiders said the faith is boring, a description embraced by one-quarter of young churchgoers as well.  The image of being sheltered means the Christian faith seems dull, flat, and lifeless."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll do mine here too.  But Tim still loses because he only tagged 2 people, and I don&#8217;t count.</p>
<p>Unchristian by David Kinnaman and Gabe Lyons</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;Christianity is so predictable,&#8217; one person we interviewed said with contempt.  Two-thrids of young outsiders said the faith is boring, a description embraced by one-quarter of young churchgoers as well.  The image of being sheltered means the Christian faith seems dull, flat, and lifeless.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad McIntosh</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/484/comment-page-1#comment-10671</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad McIntosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/484#comment-10671</guid>
		<description>I'll participate, but I won't post this on my blog, hahaha. Alright, my computer is walled-in by stacks of books, so this is somewhat arbitrary. Here is a book on top of one of a random stack:

The Felt Meanings of the World: A Metaphysics of Feeling, by Quentin Smith

"Now the problematical character of this "see-saw" among mutually canceling world-views is not recognized in these moody intuitions themselves, for in each mood it is unthematically and intuitively felt to be the case that the world-whole &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; the way it appears to be in that mood, and the previous clashing appearances exhibited by the world-whole are tacitly discounted as deceptive appearances. It is not until a moody thinking has ensued wherein I no longer &lt;i&gt;live in&lt;/i&gt;, but &lt;i&gt;reflect upon&lt;/i&gt;, my moody intuitions that I can recognize the problematic nature of these changing world-views. In the afterglow of one of these mood changes, I can turn back upon and compare the incompatible feelings of intuitive givenness; in this reflective comparison I can recognize that the givenness which is felt in the mood whose afterglow I am experiencing I am experiencing is &lt;i&gt;no different in character&lt;/i&gt; than the givenness felt in the incompatible mood I had earlier experienced."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll participate, but I won&#8217;t post this on my blog, hahaha. Alright, my computer is walled-in by stacks of books, so this is somewhat arbitrary. Here is a book on top of one of a random stack:</p>
<p>The Felt Meanings of the World: A Metaphysics of Feeling, by Quentin Smith</p>
<p>&#8220;Now the problematical character of this &#8220;see-saw&#8221; among mutually canceling world-views is not recognized in these moody intuitions themselves, for in each mood it is unthematically and intuitively felt to be the case that the world-whole <i>is</i> the way it appears to be in that mood, and the previous clashing appearances exhibited by the world-whole are tacitly discounted as deceptive appearances. It is not until a moody thinking has ensued wherein I no longer <i>live in</i>, but <i>reflect upon</i>, my moody intuitions that I can recognize the problematic nature of these changing world-views. In the afterglow of one of these mood changes, I can turn back upon and compare the incompatible feelings of intuitive givenness; in this reflective comparison I can recognize that the givenness which is felt in the mood whose afterglow I am experiencing I am experiencing is <i>no different in character</i> than the givenness felt in the incompatible mood I had earlier experienced.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Hillyer</title>
		<link>http://churchvoices.com/archives/484/comment-page-1#comment-10669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Hillyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchvoices.com/archives/484#comment-10669</guid>
		<description>Thanks for playing. This book you are reading sounds fascinating. I think I'll check it out sometime. Have a blessed weekend in the Lord.

jerry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for playing. This book you are reading sounds fascinating. I think I&#8217;ll check it out sometime. Have a blessed weekend in the Lord.</p>
<p>jerry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
