This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 12th, 2008 at 12:32 pm and is filed under Culture. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Pages:
Feeds
Categories:
- Administration (6)
- Apologetics (20)
- Church Growth (13)
- Culture (122)
- Devotional (13)
- Media (8)
- Misc. (27)
- Philosophy (18)
- Podcasts (20)
- Question (9)
- Scripture (15)
- Testimony (6)
- The Church (59)
- The Outlaw Church (3)
- Theology (70)
- Uncategorized (129)
Archives:
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Meta:
Abortion: Actually Making A Difference
03.12.2008 by Tim Reed
However, the leading domestic moral issue remains the value of helpless human life. Since Roe v. Wade, approximately 50 million unborn humans have been killed through abortion.
He goes on to make a political case, in which Christians should be voting against both Democratic candidates because of their record on abortion.
A compelling case, until one considers what voting for Republican (and allegedly pro-life candidates has gotten us). After all, there’s been 8 years of President Bush, 4 years of the first President Bush, and 8 years of President Reagan. That’s 20 years of Republican Presidents broken only by 8 years of President Clinton. And in the end the only thing that pro-life forces have gotten is some room for states to regulate a bit more.
The strongest argument is the appointment of Supreme Court judges, but even if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned (as it ought to be) the result is not outlawing abortion, but rather allowing states to legislate as they want. I’m not sure how much of a dent this would make, as it would only require crossing state lines, and I would suspect that the majority of abortions are already performed in states that would allow it remain relatively legalized.
In other words, the political campaign has been a near complete and total failure, even as general pro-life sentiment has been on the rise.
So what are the options? Well the other option is the one the church should have been doing all along, and is naturally good at to begin with: creating a community that removes the motivation for abortion. This means doing more than just setting up centers that provide the nutritional necessities for a baby (and mom). It means more than just pointing pregnant women to a computer with its browser pointed at a medicare application. It means creating a church that will provide emotional support (via real, human relationships). It means providing things like babysitting as an act of family (rather than as an act which incurs an obligation), it means making people, who in the past might have been stigmatized by the church feel accepted. It means doing this in such a way that word gets around. It means doing this in places where women have abortions regularly
Or we can just keep trying what we’ve been doing. Maybe 20 more years of Republican president will make the difference this time.
March 12th, 2008 at 1:59 pm
Good post, Tim. Definite food for thought.
March 13th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
I find this last paragraph truly compelling. I am pro-choice, and in fact I do work in abortion access. I hear many of the reasons that women choose to have abortions, and finances certainly top the list. Lack of money for additional childcare, lack of a job that provides paid maternity leave or paid sick leave (as opposed to the myth of aborting for the sake of “career”), domestic violence or hostile relationships, and so on. Would extended social services make the difference for some of these women? Quite possibly. And while I think you and I share a sense that we have a social responsibility to care for those in our communities who need assistance, I believe that it is ultimately the government (as its citizens’ proxy) which bears this burden. And for that ever to happen — for there to be mandated paid maternity leave, nationalized childcare, and true resources for single mothers to survive and thrive — well, I have serious doubts that 20 years of Republican rule will bring those things.
March 19th, 2008 at 1:52 am
I have been giving this post a lot of thought since I first read it a few days ago, and I would like to propose a counter argument from the perspective of poverty.
Many of my friends who are Christians and Democrats vote for Deomocratic candidates because of the issue of social justice. They honestly believe that the Democratic party is going to bring about an end to poverty through social policy. Yet when you look at the last 58 years, The House of Representatives has been controlled by the Democratic party for 42 of the 58 years, more than half of them with a Democratic president as well. One could argue that the ability for the Democrats to bring about social change in the area of poverty is an utter failure, yet those who think Democratic policies are a good idea have not given up. So why should those who fight for the rights of the unborn give up after less than half as long?
I think ultimately the answer for both poverty and abortion lies within the church. But one thing I do know, voting for a pro-choice candidate will certainly not speed up the end to our disgraceful treatment of the unborn. Until the Democratic party can make room for the pro-life position in their platform, I cannot in good faith support them.
March 19th, 2008 at 11:21 am
Heath,
I think you’re absolutely and totally right. Democratic policies for the reduction of poverty have utterly and totally failed, every bit as much as Republican politicians have failed to eradicate abortion.
This post was not an attempt to sway anyone to vote for anything. But it was more a reaction against pleas to put our faith, time, energy, and effort into a political process that has been useless to kingdom oriented goals like the protection of the unborn.
I believe that the rhetoric of Christian leaders has lead to Christians emphasizing the political solution to abortion over the community solution I advocated above. The end result has been that if political organizations have received lots of attention, money and support, while churches have ignored supporting those with an unwanted pregnancy.
In other words, its time for the church to reject political manipulation and begin building the kingdom with a renewed vigor in our communities.