The Good, the True, The Beautiful

08.22.2008 by Chad McIntosh

Church leaders seem obsessed with or pressured into convincing their listeners that what is taught is “relevant”. No sermon or lesson is complete unless it’s tied off with some desperate pitch on “practical application,” which as a result often seems forced or cheap.

Whatever happened to seeking knowledge for its own sake? Isn’t seeking knowledge and wisdom for its own at the very foundation of what it means to be a person of virtue, by cultivating a rich internal life? Isn’t that the beginning of the path to the good, the true, and the beautiful?

9 Responses to “The Good, the True, The Beautiful”

  1. Tim Reed Says:

    Chad,
    Knowledge applied is wisdom, something we are called to. While practical application may be something that sounds tacked on that’s a problem with how a sermon is designed rather than a problem with the concept.

  2. Heath Says:

    I see what you are saying… But I am trying to figure out how I can use this in my life… :)

  3. Chad Says:

    It’s more than just a methodological problem–It’s definitely conceptual as well.

    Some knowledge is just good for it’s own sake, which I take to mean it doesn’t necessarily have to be externally applied in order to count towards wisdom.

  4. Amy Says:

    If you are applying your knowledge then you have an experience that gives it a deeper meaning.

    I’ve heard a lot of people talk about knowledge that they have gained from the Bible, but it’s the ones that live it that make a difference.

    You don’t read about Jesus giving the crown to the person who knows the most.

  5. Chad Says:

    Amy, Amen and amen.

  6. Tim Reed Says:

    After a bit of contemplation on the matter, I would argue that knowledge is inherently applied. Every bit of knowledge we gain is in someway applied in that it changes the way we think about the world, ourselves, God, or something else. While it may not immediately manifest as a change of behavior it does change our view.

  7. Chad Says:

    My point exactly.

  8. Tim Reed Says:

    It seems to run counter to your point, in which you argue against application.

  9. Chad McIntosh Says:

    Not at all. Like I said, “Some knowledge is just good for it’s own sake, which I take to mean it doesn’t necessarily have to be externally applied in order to count towards wisdom. Indeed, the point of my post was precicely that application is not just external.

    This was also missed by Amy, who actually supported my point but probably thought was refuting it.

Leave a Reply